Skip to page content

AEGLIX MIND

Intelligence for Africa and the Gulf

AEGLIX investigation

CVE-2024-23225 research

A source-linked research view connecting vulnerability evidence, reviewed campaign mentions, retained reporting and security tool listings.

Evidence summary

A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in iOS 16.7.6 and iPadOS 16.7.6, iOS 17.4 and iPadOS 17.4, macOS Monterey 12.7.4, macOS Sonoma 14.4, macOS Ventura 13.6.5, tvOS 17.4, visionOS 1.1, watchOS 10.4. An attacker with arbitrary kernel read and write capability may be able to bypass kernel memory protections. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited.

Known exploitation: prioritize review

  • CISA KEV lists real-world exploitation.

CVSS: 7.8 · EPSS: 1.48% (2026-10-27)

Source retrieved 2026-10-28T14:23:26.272706+00:00. Read the full record and affected versions before making a patch decision.

Campaign content mentioning this CVE

Only published campaigns that passed the existing source-review gate are included. A textual mention does not establish exploitation or campaign membership.

No exact mention was found in the checked published campaign content.

Stored reporting mentioning this CVE

These are publisher excerpts, not independent verification of their claims.

No exact mention was found in the checked stored news excerpts.

Investigate advisory publishers

These domains come from vulnerability references. They are advisory publishers, not identified threat indicators. Links prefill Investigate; you choose whether to run a lookup.

Find referenced tools in Arsenal

Search published listings whose documented CVE-reference field contains CVE-2024-23225. An empty result is valid. A reference does not establish safety, exploit reliability or suitability for your environment.

Search exact CVE references in Arsenal

Review the listing’s source and trust evidence. Use testing tools only on systems you are authorized to assess.

Coverage and interpretation

Exact CVE mentions in stored public excerpts and reviewed campaign content only. A mention is not proof of exploitation, attribution or tool suitability. Missing matches do not establish absence.

Checked up to 100 candidate excerpts and 100 candidate campaigns; at most 10 results per section are shown. No external search or scan ran while loading this page.

Open structured research evidence (JSON)