AEGLIX investigation
CVE-2026-39805 research
A source-linked research view connecting vulnerability evidence, reviewed campaign mentions, retained reporting and security tool listings.
Evidence summary
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests vulnerability in mtrudel bandit allows HTTP request smuggling via duplicate Content-Length headers. 'Elixir.Bandit.Headers':get_content_length/1 in lib/bandit/headers.ex uses List.keyfind/3, which returns only the first matching header. When a request contains two Content-Length headers with different values, Bandit silently accepts it, uses the first value to read the body, and dispatches the remaining bytes as a second pipelined request on the same keep-alive connection. RFC 9112 §6.3 requires recipients to treat this as an unrecoverable framing error. When Bandit sits behind a proxy that picks the last Content-Length value and forwards the...
Assess exposure and vendor guidance
- No higher-priority signal is available in the current stored evidence.
CVSS: 6.3 · EPSS: 0.63% (2026-10-28)
Source retrieved 2026-10-28T10:19:53.450247+00:00. Read the full record and affected versions before making a patch decision.
Campaign content mentioning this CVE
Only published campaigns that passed the existing source-review gate are included. A textual mention does not establish exploitation or campaign membership.
No exact mention was found in the checked published campaign content.
Stored reporting mentioning this CVE
These are publisher excerpts, not independent verification of their claims.
No exact mention was found in the checked stored news excerpts.
Investigate advisory publishers
These domains come from vulnerability references. They are advisory publishers, not identified threat indicators. Links prefill Investigate; you choose whether to run a lookup.
- cna.erlef.org
- github.com
- osv.dev
Find referenced tools in Arsenal
Search published listings whose documented CVE-reference field contains CVE-2026-39805. An empty result is valid. A reference does not establish safety, exploit reliability or suitability for your environment.
Search exact CVE references in Arsenal
Review the listing’s source and trust evidence. Use testing tools only on systems you are authorized to assess.
Coverage and interpretation
Exact CVE mentions in stored public excerpts and reviewed campaign content only. A mention is not proof of exploitation, attribution or tool suitability. Missing matches do not establish absence.
Checked up to 100 candidate excerpts and 100 candidate campaigns; at most 10 results per section are shown. No external search or scan ran while loading this page.