AEGLIX investigation
CVE-2026-71184 research
A source-linked research view connecting vulnerability evidence, reviewed campaign mentions, retained reporting and security tool listings.
Evidence summary
Gitea's pull request review notifier does not attach the pull request to the Actions notification, so the fork workflow approval gate does not recognize the run as originating from a fork. Review comment and review approval or rejection events can consequently load workflow code from the fork head and run it on the base repository's runners without the required maintainer approval. This allows execution of fork-controlled workflow code across the intended approval boundary.
Assess exposure and vendor guidance
- No higher-priority signal is available in the current stored evidence.
CVSS: 8.8 · EPSS: 0.49% (2026-10-28)
Source retrieved 2026-10-28T10:22:17.548531+00:00. Read the full record and affected versions before making a patch decision.
Campaign content mentioning this CVE
Only published campaigns that passed the existing source-review gate are included. A textual mention does not establish exploitation or campaign membership.
No exact mention was found in the checked published campaign content.
Stored reporting mentioning this CVE
These are publisher excerpts, not independent verification of their claims.
No exact mention was found in the checked stored news excerpts.
Investigate advisory publishers
These domains come from vulnerability references. They are advisory publishers, not identified threat indicators. Links prefill Investigate; you choose whether to run a lookup.
- blog.gitea.com
- github.com
Find referenced tools in Arsenal
Search published listings whose documented CVE-reference field contains CVE-2026-71184. An empty result is valid. A reference does not establish safety, exploit reliability or suitability for your environment.
Search exact CVE references in Arsenal
Review the listing’s source and trust evidence. Use testing tools only on systems you are authorized to assess.
Coverage and interpretation
Exact CVE mentions in stored public excerpts and reviewed campaign content only. A mention is not proof of exploitation, attribution or tool suitability. Missing matches do not establish absence.
Checked up to 100 candidate excerpts and 100 candidate campaigns; at most 10 results per section are shown. No external search or scan ran while loading this page.